![]() ![]() Their main use would be to take pictures and video in a way that is far more inconspicuous than standing around with a camera. The reason Government use of drones causes more of a threat to security is because the main use of drones would be by law enforcement. Because these uses only film and record something the user already owns, there is no need to fear for privacy concerns. Agricultural uses and repair and maintenance uses are also of no real threat to privacy. Some film makers overseas have used their drones to show just how little privacy we still possess by flying over Facebook and Google offices in Dublin and have so far avoided any confrontation from the companies by stating, “We feel that it is no more intrusive than something like Google Street View” ( ). The addition of drones does very little to change this as film crews in the past have often used helicopters and cranes to get shots drones are just a quality of life improvement. Filming a movie rarely clashes with privacy concerns because directors desire a set to be exactly as they see it, and therefore section off areas as to not capture any private activity. Filmmaking uses of drones is one of the easiest to rule out as not privacy invasive. There are already voyeurism laws in place which should handle drones as many states are already updating them to include drone activities. The only time there are real privacy concerns are when recreational flying turns more voyeuristic. That means the majority of recreational flying, it is done over public property which raises very little concern for the protection of privacy. In hobbyist or recreation flying, people tend to like open areas such as parks to fly. Private use of drones is almost always used for one of a couple purposes: hobbyist or recreational flying, filmmaking, agricultural or land surveying, or finally checking for necessity of repair or maintenance. Private use of drones does not pose as much of a threat to security as widespread government use of drones for a couple of reasons. Thirdly, I will explain the advantages and disadvantages of the regulation of drones and how it could affect both private and government usage. Secondly, the US should pass legislation restricting what private citizens and businesses do with drones. Firstly, private use of drones does not pose as much of a threat to privacy as widespread government use of drones. There are three things that help to clear up these gray areas. With drones becoming more and more popular as a tech used both by private citizens and, more recently law enforcement, there are new areas in which the line between private and public has become blurred. In the United States, there has always been a tug of war between protection of privacy and investigation rights of law enforcement and similar government agencies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |